Andrew Rowlas Challenging Silverstein for Alderman

Andrew Rowlas, a community activist and former educator, has announced his candidacy for alderman of the 50th Ward, challenging two-term incumbent Debra Silverstein.

Rowlas is campaigning on a progressive platform of economic development centered around small businesses, improved educational opportunities for neighborhood students, and civic engagement by neighborhood residents.

His goals are in sharp contrast to Silverstein’s eight years of inertia. The ward still waits for the economic development plan she promised in 2011. Her lack of transparency and refusal to engage with her constituents are near legendary, even for Chicago. She is one of the Mayor’s most dependable stooges, a reliable member of the rubber-stamp brigade in the City Council.

Rowlas has served as president of the West Ridge Community Organization, is a leading member of LEARN–the coalition of community members and organizations that led the charge for a new library– and has worked extensively to foster communication and cooperation between and with all ethnic and religious communities across the ward. He was instrumental in the formation of the Warren Park Advisory Council, which gives local residents a voice in Park activities.

It’s worth noting that, after nearly 8 years in office, Silverstein had never shown any interest in connecting the north side’s largest park with its nearby residents. Rowlas saw the need to do so and rallied other activists to make it happen. Just imagine the great things that could happen in the 50th with a proactive alderman!

Rowlas spent 38 years as a teacher, counselor, and principal. He would be a strong voice for increased quality educational opportunities both in the ward and across Chicago.

Support the Rowlas campaign by volunteering or donating via the campaign Web site,

Silverstein will not be able to run a Rose Garden campaign this year. I look forward to the coming debates. And so should you.


The Town Hall Meeting That Wasn’t

A true town hall meeting brings citizens together to discuss local issues, to try to reach consensus on important issues, to work together with local officials to resolve problems of concern to the community.

The alderman’s July 27 town hall meeting was misnamed. At best, it was a panel discussion moderated by the alderman during which a lucky few got to ask questions of various city and police officials.  At worst, it was a dog and pony show designed to satisfy the alderman’s burden of actually meeting with her constituents.

She began by acknowledging the presence of her husband and mother, naming her staff, and thanking them for their hard work.  [Ira’s presence at all ward meetings raises some interesting questions, since he apparently doesn’t attend meetings in the 40th Ward, also in his Illinois Senate district.]

“I like to have yearly community meetings to discuss issues in the ward,” she said, and noted that her two most important areas of concern since she was elected in 2011 have been public safety and constituent services.

And when she hears of an issue in the ward, she and her staff “immediately go into problem-solving mode.”  This ownership approach to issues suits her base, but not those in the ward who’d like to be part of the solution to its problems.

She then introduced Commissioner Charles Williams from the City’s Department of Streets & Sanitation, Commissioner Rebekah Scheinfeld of the Department of Transportation, local resident Gary Litherland, who handles public relations for the Chicago Department of Water Management, and Sgt. Shawn Sisk, representing the 24th District CAPS office. Each would make a short presentation and then respond to questions from the audience.

But first the alderman pointed to a large ward map displayed at the front of the room, and said it showed the many streets that have been resurfaced during her tenure, adding that she “personally drives” the ward’s streets, ranking them from best to worst. She did not say why she rather than the ward superintendent is performing that task. [FYI: ward superintendents are paid $70,000 – $111,000 per year; the alderman is paid $117,333.]

Valuable meeting time was wasted as the alderman read the dates, times, and locations of August’s ward events, instead of simply referring the audience to the ward calendar on her Web site.

Presentations were short and to the point. Commissioner Williams advised that his department would prefer that rat-baiting requests be made using the City’s online form rather than through 311 calls; this enables his staff to better track the requests.

With regard to the safety of Orthodox Jewish residents over the Sabbath, Sgt. Sisk said he had spoken with a rabbi from the Chicago Rabbinical Council on July 7, and that he was assured that it was permissible for those residents needing police or emergency assistance to use the telephone.

Sisk also advised that organizing block clubs and attending CAPS meeting will help with crime deterrence. He noted that he and another officer were distributing leaflets in one section of the ward, and he found “at least fifteen” homes he could have burglarized because residents had failed to lock doors and close windows–common sense safety precautions.

Residents who find graffiti are asked to take photos of it as well as report it on the City’s online form. This is important–the police can review the photos and determine if the graffiti is gang-related, kids fooling around, or just plain vandalism. E-mail the photos to

Then it was time for audience Q&A, and the issues raised were a lesson in how well the alderman knows her supporters.

The 50th Ward has recently been home to three homicides, including drive-by shootings. Thugs who live here make headlines being arrested for murder and serious crimes committed in other neighborhoods. The police have issued alerts for burglaries. Yet the first question from the audience came from affluent condo owners upset at being approached by panhandlers.

Horrors! They’ve crossed the bridge! They’re on our streets, asking for money! They walk in the middle of the street and one can’t turn into the driveways at Winston Towers! And it gets worse–they have cell phones!

The real crime, of course, is homelessness. People who live in condos are threatened by the less fortunate who live under bridges. People with cable, Internet, and smart phones don’t like the idea that panhandlers have access to emergency services, to the social service agencies that are struggling to get them off the streets, or to the job placement offices that might help them get back on their feet. No such compassion. They aren’t poor enough, with those government-issued cell phones that give them a measure of security and a sense that they, too, have value.

Useful suggestions were made: don’t give them any money and they’ll go away. Call the police. Know which corner they’re causing a problem on, because there are various jurisdictions in the area–Skokie, Lincolnwood, the 24th and 17th police districts. But keep calling. And be sure to ask to sign as a co-complainant when the police make an arrest. You’ll have to take time to go to court, but in time you will clear the streets and underpasses of those life didn’t bless as it blessed you.

There were many questions and comments about the Eid fireworks. This is the second year that neighborhood residents were subjected to overnight explosions lasting hours, and neighbors wanted to know why it happened again and why the police were unable to stop it. One woman said that when she called, she was told that the alderman had ordered that the police not intervene, a charge that the alderman vehemently denied.

There were complaints about heavy crowds in the street outside the mosque on Campbell, a residential street. What the responses boiled down to was that the police did the best they could. Sisk did suggest that perhaps some discussions could be initiated with mosque leadership before next year’s celebrations. He could not answer why that had not been done this year.

To be fair, it was clear he and the police were the designated scapegoats for the alderman’s failure to use her office to negotiate a peaceful and respectful way for our Muslim neighbors to celebrate the end of Ramadan. That failure indefensible, she said nothing.

There were questions about clogged sewers and standing water. Litherland said that, as sewers are being replaced and relined, they are being fitted with filters that slow  drainage; this is why there’s standing water in streets and alleys. He added that it is not considered a problem if water is standing for an hour or so, but is a concern if the water remains after 3-4 hours. In that case, a 311 call is in order. One resident noted that one reason for the pooling is that alley grades are not level; the alleys have sunk while the garages remain at grade, and this creates a natural pool for rainwater.

He could have added that the grooves cut into the alleys to permit drainage were in many cases paved over, wholly or partly, during the pre-election constituent services blitz.

The final question concerned the now-vacant lot at Pratt & Western. The alderman said that the building was torn down because it was unstable. There are no current plans for development. The property has been downzoned, and a community meeting will be required before any development can occur there. The same is true for the site at Western and Granville.

The meeting was carefully structured to minimize the alderman’s participation and avoid serious issues, like school funding losses, property tax increases, and the City’s budget and pension problems. Those important issues will apparently have to wait until 2016.

What’s an Eyesore?

There’s a hearing tomorrow, July 8, at 2 p.m., in Courtroom 1107 at the Daley Center about the building at 2906-10 West Devon Avenue. The City filed suit on June 12 and a lis pendens notice on June 22, meaning the owner has been notified that there is now a legal claim against the property that could affect both the title and the property’s value. The building in question formerly housed Rosenblum’s World of Judaica, which closed in 2010 after 37 years at that location. DSC_05751083Alderman Silverstein informed the community  that the building has not been properly maintained by its owner and a City inspection revealed numerous code violations. She has therefore asked the City to force the owner of this “eyesore” to make the necessary repairs and rent the now-vacant storefronts.  The property is owned by Khalid J. Siddiqui. No problems are obvious in this recent photo.

She has taken no action against other, real eyesores, like the old Sheldon Cord Products building, that are clearly in far worse shape. The building has been vacant for years. One of the Ugliest Buildings on DevonIn April 2015, 2201 Devon LLC succeeded Schubert Development Partners LLC as owner. We’ll see whether this is merely an administrative change or will spell real improvement for the site. It’s hard to see how it could look any worse.

The board-up at the former dry cleaning shop just a short distance from the old Rosenblum’s is a horrible site. The wood is weather-beaten and warped, DSC_05771085and the addition of the American flag as a decoration on both the building and the oversize sign board hanging above the sidewalk make the building look even more decrepit as one moves closer. The wood is rotting at sidewalk level. It’s a dismal and depressing sight. The property is owned by Harrison-Ogden-Wolcott LLC according to

Then there’s this poorly maintained property across the street from the property the alderman is so concerned about. DSC_05761084It may be part of a medical office located next door. When the office is open it appears that both storefronts are connected. This property looks shabby and dirty and in need of immediate repair.

There are many more examples of buildings on Devon that are all but falling apart. The same can be said of commercial buildings throughout the ward. So why is the building at 2906-10 West Devon a problem, for whom, and why now?

It’s no secret that the Jewish Community Council has been working to restore the traditional Jewish shopping district that used to exist on the west end of Devon. But the alderman’s use of the term “eyesore” to describe the old Rosenblum’s site reminded me of the sudden push to sell the theater site at Devon & McCormick in March. Where that property was described as an eyesore and an attraction for criminals, this one is being described as an eyesore riddled with building code violations. In both cases urgent action was/is required and community participation invited.

We all know how that turned out.

The alderman’s actions also reminded me of the re-election stunt from last Fall when she gave the impression that she forced the sale of storefronts on Touhy Avenue that were also described as rundown. I learned from an informed reader that the property sale was already in process when the alderman decided to intervene. The sale was used in her advertising as evidence of her concern for economic development. The storefronts are still vacant.

I suspect that the Rosenblum’s site is nowhere near as bad as it’s made out to be. I also suspect that there’s probably already an interested buyer for the property. The pending lawsuit means the value of the property will decrease, because any buyer would become responsible for repairing the alleged defects. Wanna bet those will turn out to be minor if the right buyer comes along?

I welcome new business. The ward needs it. Our business districts are shabby, dirty, and filled with vacancies. I’d even welcome the alderman’s participation in this little drama if I could just believe she’s acting in the community’s best interests and not in the interests of those who know how the game is played. The goal may be to force Mr. Siddiqui out by playing hardball over minor violations, jeopardizing his title to the property and thus lowering its price for a buyer already waiting in the shadows.

The case number is 2015-M1-401751. No appearance has yet been filed by the defendants’ attorney(s).

In the meantime, let’s help the alderman locate all the deteriorating storefronts in the ward that could use her influence with the City. Send your pictures to Ald. Silverstein at

A Further Explanation

The alderman has used her latest newsletter to further explain her position on the medical marijuana dispensary proposed for Western Avenue. She now claims that her “personal objection to this location is due to the unique security needs… required”  by the business. She says that she is “uncomfortable with any business that would need a fingerprint scanner and two armed guards being right next door to a park where hundreds of children play.” The alderman also notes that because credit card companies and banks currently do not recognize sales of medical marijuana, the business will be cash-only.

Regardless of the alderman’s opinion, the law does not prohibit this dispensary from opening next to Warren Park. If the alderman believes the law should be changed, then both she and her husband, State. Sen. Ira Silverstein, are in position to propose bills to that effect. So far, neither has done so.

According to a recent article by Jeremy Culver for WGEM in Quincy, Illinois, the state has yet to see a single dispensary open. State Rep. Lou Lang, who wrote Illinois’ medical marijuana bill, is quoted extensively by Culver. Lang notes that his bill provided for a four-year trial program and that nearly half that time is already gone. The state experienced some difficulties in establishing its regulations, and Lang notes that the longer it takes to set the program up, the more expensive the marijuana is likely to become. In the meantime, Illinois patients take their prescriptions elsewhere. Read the full article here.

The alderman has asked again that neighborhood residents appear at City Hall at 9 a.m. on May 28 for the hearing at the Zoning Board of Appeals. According to the City’s Web site, these meetings usually take place in the City Council chambers.


Patients Aren’t Potheads

Here we go again.

A medical marijuana dispensary, one of only 13 in the entire city, has been proposed for 6501 North Western Avenue, next door to Warren Park. The owner says he plans to hire workers from the 50th Ward, particularly veterans and the disabled. Most residents are happy to see a viable business that would employ neighborhood residents and relieve human suffering choose West Ridge as its location.

The only resident whose vote determines whether or not that business opens doesn’t agree. On Friday Alderman Silverstein announced that she is “unequivocally” opposed to any medical marijuana clinic in the 50th Ward. Just flatly refused to consider it. In true Silverstein style, she offered no reasons, no explanation of the thinking behind her opposition.

On Sunday, the alderman claimed her opposition is based on the “hundreds of children” from 2 to 17 engaged in the park’s sports activities, day camp, and other year-round programs. As further justification, she bizarrely noted that “In addition, Warren Park is home to three playgrounds, tennis courts, batting cages and an ice skating rink,”  all apparently in danger from seriously ill people filling valid prescriptions at a legal business tightly regulated by federal, state, and local authorities.

She supports the idea of medical marijuana, she says, but many residents have told her that they object to the facility, and now “…it has become my feeling that this is not the proper location….”  The clincher comes when she announces that she “strongly believe(s) in community involvement…” and wants to hear from everyone in the neighborhood.

The similarities between this proposed business and the recently-approved storage facility are too obvious to overlook.

Both campaigns began with fear-mongering.  Then it was the alleged crisis of “almost daily” crime at the old theater, now it’s the danger to 2-year-olds from patients seeking to relieve their suffering. Just like a storage facility is the only business that could open on the theater site, a medical marijuana dispensary is the only business that can’t open across from the park. The community is invited to have a role in the process, and then it turns out that the “majority” doesn’t represent the entire community.

I have heard only one person speak against the proposed business, and that’s Debra Silverstein.

Let’s look at the other businesses currently across from the park.

Is the alderman worried about McDonald’s? Should kids be exposed to all that fat and salt, all those empty calories? I’ve yet to meet a kid who goes to McDonald’s for the salad. Using the alderman’s logic, we should ban fast food operators from locating across from parks lest they turn our kids away from healthy outdoor activities and get them hooked on unhealthy foods.

What about the car showrooms? Cars are dangerous, too. Speed. Sex. Independence. Should we encourage kids to dream of the day when they can zoom away in their very own speedster to indulge in who-knows-what illicit pleasures? We’ll need to ban car sales on Western to protect the kids.

How about those vacant stores and lots? Exposing kids to business failure, encouraging graffiti, suggesting political indifference. Should we attract some business that might bring employment and payroll taxes and benefit some members of the community as well? Not if it’s a medical marijuana dispensary. Better to let some alderman with less moral indignation and more common sense snap it up to benefit another ward.

The alderman’s protests ring hollow. The change between Friday’s absolute refusal to allow the dispensary to set up shop anywhere in the ward and Sunday’s I-just-want-to-protect-the-kids backtracking suggests that the messages she’s heard are in support of the proposed business, not against it. She might be open to locating it elsewhere. Meanwhile, she invites residents to attend the public meeting on May 28 at the Zoning Board of Appeals. This could be another formality, another event staged to look like democracy in action.

Is another done deal in the works? Is there another packed meeting in our future? Are we in for another display of moral hypocrisy?

We’ll need to protect the kids from that, too.

A Done Deal

It was a done deal after all. A 600- to 900-unit storage facility will open at Devon and McCormick despite community opposition.

An observer who knew nothing about democracy might think he’d seen it in action last night. Citizens engaged in debate about the merits of a planned economic development, followed by a vote to determine whether or not that development would proceed.

In truth, it was a farce all too typical of what passes for citizen involvement in 50th Ward decision-making. The outcome had been determined in advance, and was guaranteed by packing the room with direct beneficiaries of the disputed development. The outnumbered but vocal opponents were politely listened to and just as politely ignored.

Ald. Silverstein opened the meeting by stating that discussion would be limited to the question of the storage facility, and said that she was unaware of any other proposals for the site. She introduced Rabbi Wolf, whom she described as “the school’s owner,” and he gave a highly selective history of the acquisition and ownership of the site by Cheder Lubavitch Hebrew Day School. [The school has owned the property since 2008, and had an interest in it since summer of 2007.]

According to the rabbi, although 174 businesses expressed interest in acquiring the property once the school decided to sell it, the exceptionally high rent charged for the parking lot by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) was a deal-breaker in every case. Raising his voice dramatically, and waving his index finger in the air, the rabbi declared that “…there is one, and only one, business [that doesn’t need the parking lot].” That would be—wait for it—a storage facility.

But, the rabbi said, he didn’t want “a box” to replace the theater, he wanted a “state of the art” storage facility. Apparently this was meant to show his concern for the community.

The rabbi’s performance was at times near comical in its exaggeration, but met with rousing applause from the two-thirds of the room that will benefit directly from the sale of the property to Banner Storage Group.

The rabbi was followed by Gary Delaney from Banner, who said that Banner will demolish the car wash and remodel the theater site, which will lose its rooftop heating and cooling equipment, thus making the building somewhat less high even though it will have five floors instead of the present three. The drawings presented depict a boxy, multi-level building whose signage was immediately questioned by an audience member. Would the signs be tasteful, she asked. The response was classic: Signage will comply with city requirements. Pressed a bit further, he reluctantly allowed that signage would be “tasteful.” We’ll see.

He described the average storage facility customer as a woman who wants easy access to her property as she goes about her day. He said that as homes get smaller, storage facilities are needed to store things like snow skis in summer and bikes in winter. An audience member questioned whether another storage facility is needed, referring to the near-empty 180-unit Safeguard storage facility at Peterson and California, which the man said he understood is only 7% leased. Delaney responded by stating that he used to be VP for Safeguard; that he hired the manager of the California/Peterson facility; that he thinks it has about 600 units; and that he didn’t know what percentage of units were occupied.

I’d call this nonsense, since nobody opening a business would not know about his immediate competition in detail, but in this case it’s probably true. It’s the same line of thinking that has given us 50 groceries and 22 cell phone stores in 24 blocks on Devon Avenue. It’s the mentality that says that any kind of business is better than no business at all. It’s what happens when a neighborhood has to take whatever it can get.

David St. Pierre, Executive Director of MWRD, stated that the property was evaluated by MWRD at $2M, and that MWRD is required by statute to charge a percentage of that evaluation as rent for the parking lot, currently $120,000 per year. He had stated at the previous meeting on this development that changing the statute would be difficult and time-consuming.

Think about that: A law that impedes economic development cannot be changed. Ever. Yet I understand that the law was changed to favor the school when it bought the property. More on that in a later post.

The attorney for the school, in a voice choked with emotion, declared that the school considered the hulking storage facility to be “fair” to the community, noting that “nobody is going to get rich” on the sale, although he admitted that the school will get back every penny of its investment and then some. He pleaded with opponents of the storage facility to understand that he himself had spent “dozens” of hours trying to find another solution. He did not say if he volunteered his time or was paid for it.

St. Pierre has “a contract ready to go.” The Chicago Park District will manage the property, although it has no funds for playground equipment. Present plans “call for only grass and trees.” One audience member asked Delaney if Banner would donate some money for that purpose. Trapped, he agreed to donate “the first $10,000.” Another round of applause from the winning side.

Other questions from the please-no-storage community:

Can the neighborhood get a set of plans for the site? No. Nothing’s been approved yet, said the alderman, and that’s the reason for the meeting. Not to fear: Banner is ready to submit plans and can start work this year. More cheers from the school’s supporters.

Won’t a storage facility contribute to a lack of vibrancy in the area, since many stores in the Lincoln Village shopping center are vacant? wondered another audience member. She noted that, should the storage facility go through, we’d no doubt be back for another community meeting about the shopping center’s troubles. She was listened to politely. The response was more praise for storage.

The alderman announced a vote. Since the school had packed the audience, the school won. Victory was declared, cheers erupted, and the wider community lost another round to special interests.

The property will be returned to the tax rolls after its 10-year absence, but it will be interesting to see what tax breaks and taxpayer support Banner will receive for the project. There is an existing TIF that includes the Lincoln Village Shopping Center, but it’s not clear if this property is included.

Whether it might have been more fair to hold a series of community meetings is now moot. The audience at the first meeting knew instinctively that this was a done deal, and that any follow-up meeting would be a sham. And it was. But neither the school nor the alderman wanted real outreach to the community. The deal might not have gone through if they had, so the storage proponents raised false alarms about crime and rushed the project through, then packed the room to ensure a favorable vote.

Under the Silversteins’ leadership, civic participation in the ward has declined markedly. Even allowing for the high percentage of undocumented residents (10-12% according to the 2010 census), the number of residents who bother to vote has reached a new low, with nearly 4,000 fewer voters in this year’s aldermanic election than turned out when Debra Silverstein ran the first time in 2011, and just shy of 2,000 fewer voters this time around than voted in the subsequent run-off.

People don’t participate in civic activities and don’t vote when they believe they don’t have a stake in the outcome and/or that their participation is meaningless. Roughly 125 people out of a ward of 55,000 residents voted for a storage facility. Virtually all of them had a personal stake in the outcome, since the Cheder Lubavitch school is the sole beneficiary of the sale.

That’s 0.23% of the population of West Ridge. That’s what passes for democracy in the 50th Ward.

Participatory Budgeting

The lucky residents of the 49th Ward will begin voting this Saturday on how to spend the ward’s $1.3M in menu money. Here’s the sample ballot for this year’s choices:


I’d like to see participatory budgeting in the 50th Ward. Maybe pressure from residents can achieve in our ward what the alderman has so far resisted: input from residents into both menu money spending and community development decisions.


Devon-McCormick Redevelopment, Round 2

Ald. Silverstein has called a meeting to discuss with residents the redevelopment of the abandoned 1-6 Cineplex and adjacent car wash at Devon and McCormick. The meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 20, at 6:30 p.m. at West Ridge Elementary School, 6700 North Whipple.  This is your chance to tell the alderman that you want a cultural center, not a storage facility, as the western gateway to our neighborhood.

I understand from a posting on NextDoor West Ridge that other potential uses are being considered for the site. No specifics at this writing, although I’ve asked what those other developments might be and who is driving them. You can read the thread here.

It’s important that as many residents as possible attend, especially if you’d prefer that the neighborhood have at least one cultural institution, just one place where we could celebrate the arts and artists and cultures that are so important in building community. Those of us opposed to yet another storage facility need to be represented. This is not a decision that should be made without real input from the community.

Even though the alderman didn’t approve this project right away, I suspect that it is a done deal. I was told last week by someone who should know that the alderman has been getting calls telling her that she needs to approve the storage facility or some of her support will disappear. Frankly, given her victory in February, I don’t see how any threats to withdraw support would have any effect. Most of her campaign contributions came from outside the ward, although she did accept money from business interests within the ward and from individual resident donors.

No matter what she decides, Silverstein will disappoint a significant number of residents. Which part of her constituency loses on this issue will be a major indicator of the ward’s direction over the next four years.

[See related posts, “Storage Facility or Cultural Center?,” “West Ridge: No Cultural Institutions, Lots of Storage,” and “More Storage Coming” for the history of this proposed development.]


Election Shenanigans Again?

I was called on Election Day by a voter who said that judges in “the precinct on Kedzie” had been urging voters to vote for Rahm Emanuel. The caller said that there were no pollwatchers in that precinct. I referred the caller to both the Garcia campaign and the State’s Attorney’s office, and understand that an investigator was to be dispatched to find out what was happening.

There were reports in the February election that judges in certain precincts were telling voters that there were no write-in candidates when, in fact, there were two, Fuji Shioura and Peter Sifnotis. I don’t know yet if this precinct was involved in that episode as well.

The alderman, her husband, and one of their daughters visited every precinct on election day in February, asking about turnout and greeting voters, a clear violation of election law, as was the alderman’s visit, again accompanied by her husband, to the early voting site in Warren Park during the campaign. They left only after their presence was challenged by another candidate.

We’ll be voting in primary elections just about a year from now. It’s time for more citizens to consider becoming involved in the electoral process as election judges or poll watchers. Without honest people committed to fair elections on duty in every precinct on election day, we will continue to have incidents like these.

We cannot and should not allow this to become standard election behavior. The fact that all political power in the ward is held by one family–the Silversteins–should not mean that election laws don’t apply in the 50th Ward.



Payback Pettiness

My precinct voted against Debra Silverstein in February. Such independence requires payback.

For the mayoral run-off, my precinct was not assigned a PA (Precinct Assistant) to set up the electronic equipment. Precincts that supported Debra were. Judges didn’t get any coffee or lunch, either, although judges in precincts that supported Debra did. I also heard that two other precincts that came out against Debra in February had malfunctioning equipment in April.

The ward committeeman is responsible for the election process, so this was Silverstein-controlled from start to finish. And there was no warning that no PA would be available to us. We had to call downtown to find that none had been assigned.

Now, it’s true that the Board of Elections makes it clear that judges should not expect to be fed by anybody other than themselves. But assigning PAs? It’s telling that the precincts that supported Debra in February were the only ones that received support from the ward committeeman’s office in April.

This is exactly the way the Silversteins apportion city services in the ward: friends and supporters get more than their fair share of street cleaning, road paving, and new lighting.  The rebellious southeast side of the ward gets nothing. The decision not to support all precincts equally is troubling because the electoral process is taxpayer-supported, just like City services. Public resources should be allocated fairly and equally, a concept unknown to the Silversteins.

Except the street scape. Storage facilities. And political pettiness.

I have a feeling payback season is just beginning. Stay tuned.