Results from the alderman’s survey, released yesterday, make interesting reading. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. According to the alderman’s newsletter, “more than 1,500 people have completed” her survey, reportedly “…a broad and diverse segment of the 50th Ward” including “speakers of all the major languages spoken in the neighborhood….” [There was a question on the survey asking which languages respondents speak, but the survey itself was available online only in English.] The alderman says that she’s “…given the survey results to the project architects, so they can use your comments and input to design a library that fits the unique needs and desires…” of West Ridge residents.
A closer look at the results reveals that:
- 68% of respondents don’t use the Northtown Library
- 32% use a different library
- 36% don’t use Northtown
- 32% use Northtown.
- 52% of respondents don’t even visit the Northtown Library
- 37% of respondents are over age 50 (555 respondents based on 1,500 total)
- Their votes were distributed most evenly across choices; the only group to highly rank adult reading space and community meeting rooms as top priorities
- 63% want an outdoor reading space
- 56% want a coffee bar
- 23% of respondents are between ages 16 and 49 (345 respondents) with (2%, or 7 respondents, between ages 16 – 25)
- Overwhelmingly in favor of children’s space and technology; fewest votes for community meeting rooms and adult reading spaces (no surprises here–these are the prime parenting years)
- 73% want an outdoor reading space
- 63% want a coffee bar
- 40% of respondents are children 16 and under (600 respondents)
- Most votes for technology, children’s and teen spaces; very little interest in adult reading space; least interested in community meeting rooms
- 83% want an outdoor reading space
- 76% want a coffee bar
This is community input? The alderman passed this along to the architects as what the community wants? A coffee bar chosen by children? Results determined by people who don’t use the library? Who don’t even visit? Who apparently took the survey as a classroom exercise? If we build the coffee bar, will the children come?
I sometimes wonder if the alderman is paying attention to what she’s doing. It’s simply inexcusable to present her survey results to the architects when they are clearly just plain goofy. It’s irresponsible of her to ignore the results of the LEARN survey, which was not heavily influenced by kids but was taken by thoughtful adults trying to provide serious input on a major community project. Had she gone to the community for input sooner, she might have designed a survey whose results could have been useful in planning the new library.
The alderman should have scrapped her survey results and started over.
Unless we want 600 kids to be the determining factor in what kind of library we get.